PD should be collborative

First:

• PD should be collaborative
• I wrote in Chapter 2: "it is collaborative and aims to promote and connect participants in learning communities."
• Also I wrote: "it ensures collaboration to produce shared understanding, shared investement, thoughtful development, and a fair, rigorous test of selected ideas" (Little 1988)
• So the PD program should facilitate or enhance collaboration.
• Collaboration is .... [definition]
• The Internet is opening opportunities to collaborate between teachers, educators, not only in the physical site, but also in virtual world.

Second:

• Online PD has emerged to implement the idea of the potential of the Internet for collaboration
• Some example: ....[ref]
• The question: how this research address the issue: the uses of the Internet for PD, which is collaborative

Third: The case of Ann

• Just give several examples

Fourth: The case of Jack

• The first meaning: the uses of the Internet by Jack to collaborate with others (through online)
• The second meaning: Jack and I should be collaborative. There are lots of collaboration happened [give an example], some plans did not work?
• Explain the issue, why we could not achieve an effective collaboration? Even though some evidence indicated that we were actually a collaborative person. (zones theory will explain this better) as well as the theory of collaboration

Five:

• The connection of this finding with the previous research (e.g. community learning or oTPD)

Sixth:

• The implication for Indonesian context